The Resolution Foundation, a British think-tank, revisited a highly influential graphic – the \u201celephant chart\u201d – produced by Branko Milanovic, a former senior official at the World Bank, and found that it could be reinterpreted.<\/p>\n
Mr Milanovic’s \u201cchart that explains the world\u201d showed how globalisation, over the past 30 years, was responsible for the stagnating incomes of the middle classes in developed countries, while the global super-rich became even richer, and China saw its middle class booming.<\/p>\n
First published in a 2012 World Bank working paper, the chart purports to represent the income gains made by the world\u2019s population between the period of \u2018high globalisation\u2019 in\u00a01988 (the fall of the Berlin wall) to the start of the global financial crisis in 2008 (the fall of Lehman Brothers).<\/p>\n
![\"rf-chart-with-comments4\"](\"http:\/\/chief-exec.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/09\/RF-chart-with-comments4.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
It looks like an elephant raising its trunk with the tail on the left representing the poorest in the world (locked out of growth) and the trunk on the right the richest (the booming global elite).<\/p>\n
Middle classes in China and other emerging economies (in the middle of the distribution) and the planet\u2019s economic elite at the end of the chart (forming the raised trunk of the elephant) seem to have hugely benefited from the effects of globalisation.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n Meanwhile, “the biggest losers (other than the very poorest 5 per cent), or at least the ‘non-winners’, of globalisation were those between the 75th and 90th percentiles of the global income distribution whose real income gains were essentially nil,” according to\u00a0Mr Milanovic.<\/p>\n These \u201cnon-winners\u201d include ordinary people in the west, mainly in the US (and supposedly Donald Trump\u2019s core supporters) and Europe, pointing to a decline of the developed world’s middle class, which would partly explain the rise of populism in rich countries.<\/p>\n However, in its report the Resolution Foundation noted two main flaws in the way the original data used to produce the \u201celephant chart\u201d were aggregated:<\/p>\n Based on this diagnostic, Adam Corlett, an analyst at the Resolution Foundation, produced new charts correcting these apparent distortions.<\/p>\n Mr Corlett told Chief-Exec.com on Tuesday that \u201cone thing that emerges from the data is just how astounding income growth has been in China. Between 1988 and 2008 typical incomes tripled (200 per cent growth \u2013 rising to >500 per cent for the richest) \u2013 even faster than many have interpreted from the hump of the original elephant chart. Incomes in most other developing countries, conversely, have grown less phenomenally, with growth rates that are not too different from the mature economies.\u201d<\/p>\n This new adjusted version shows that the low and middle incomes and so-called \u201cnon-winners\u201d have not fared as badly as first thought. It actually shows that their incomes have even improved over the years.<\/p>\n\n